[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [rtl] RTLinux footprint

To: "'Dave Chase'" <londoc@blackbury.com>
Subject: RE: [rtl] RTLinux footprint
From: "dyd" <dyd@process.buaa.edu.cn>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 17:05:01 +0800
Cc: "'rtl@rtlinux.org'" <rtl@rtlinux.org>

Hi, all

My native language is not English, so I don't know the exact mean of footprint.
Anybody can help mean, thx a lot.

Dyd


-----Original Message-----
From:	Dave Chase [SMTP:londoc@blackbury.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, March 08, 2000 10:38 AM
To:	rtl@rtlinux.org
Subject: 	[rtl] RTLinux footprint


 << File: londoc.vcf >> I am trying to determine whether some flavor of RT Linux is suitable for
my application. Target is based on the AMD Elan chip (x86 system), <1mB
pgm memory and flash storage (<4MB). Will use PPP to support online
target management via SNMP (MIB-based) or WWW (Server based). RT
performance is not a serious issue. What is a reasonable embedded
footprint for embedded Linux, supporting simple flash file system,
protocol stack, and WWW server/SNMP Agent?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [rtl] RTLinux footprint
  - From: Phil Wilshire <philwil@on-ramp.ior.com>
- Re: [rtl] RTLinux footprint
  - From: Stuart Hughes <sehughes@zentropix.com>

Prev by Date: Help with ideas, RTL newcomer...
Next by Date: hrtime_t to string
Prev by thread: Help with ideas, RTL newcomer...
Next by thread: Re: [rtl] RTLinux footprint
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread