[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [rtl] RTLinux footprint

To: Dave Chase <londoc@blackbury.com>
Subject: Re: [rtl] RTLinux footprint
From: Jeff Studer <jstuder@aquilagroup.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 10:14:39 -0700 (MST)
cc: rtl@rtlinux.org
In-Reply-To: <38C5BD02.3C57E3E@blackbury.com>

at my place of employment, we are using PPC and AMD.  being that i work
with the PPC, i can tell you that the Linux kernel alone is about 400K on
average.  i believe similar is true for the AMD kernels.  This is NOT
RTLinux, mind you, but is most certainly embedded.

hope that was helpful.

Jeff Studer
jstuder@aquilagroup.com

On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Dave Chase wrote:

> I am trying to determine whether some flavor of RT Linux is suitable for
> my application. Target is based on the AMD Elan chip (x86 system), <1mB
> pgm memory and flash storage (<4MB). Will use PPP to support online
> target management via SNMP (MIB-based) or WWW (Server based). RT
> performance is not a serious issue. What is a reasonable embedded
> footprint for embedded Linux, supporting simple flash file system,
> protocol stack, and WWW server/SNMP Agent?
> 
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [rtl] RTLinux footprint
  - From: Der Herr Hofrat <der.herr@hofr.at>

References:
- RTLinux footprint
  - From: Dave Chase <londoc@blackbury.com>

Prev by Date: rtl-digest
Next by Date: Re: [rtl] accessing device driver from user space
Prev by thread: RTLinux footprint
Next by thread: Re: [rtl] RTLinux footprint
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread