[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [rtl] root id

To: Frederic Cazenave <cazenave@radar.mcgill.ca>
Subject: Re: [rtl] root id
From: Nathan Paul Simons <npsimons@fsmlabs.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 23:04:09 -0700
Cc: Der Herr Hofrat <der.herr@hofr.at>, Ludwig Öfele <Ludwig.Oefele@humantec.de>, rtl@rtlinux.org
In-Reply-To: <3A9447A8.33037D4A@radar.mcgill.ca>; from cazenave@radar.mcgill.ca on Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 05:56:40PM -0500
Organization: Finite State Machine Labs <http://www.fsmlabs.com/>
References: <200102211758.f1LHwBw17483@kanga.hofr.at> <3A9447A8.33037D4A@radar.mcgill.ca>
Reply-To: npsimons@fsmlabs.com
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i

On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 05:56:40PM -0500, Frederic Cazenave wrote:
<snip>
> gcc -v
> Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96/specs
> gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.0)
<snip>

	Erk . . . um, there have been known problems compiling the kernel
with RedHat's "stable" distribution because they decided to put a cutting
edge compiler in it.  I don't know if that version of the compiler (2.96)
miscompiles RTLinux, but I wouldn't rule that out.  Have you tried getting
the updates for RedHat or using a different version of the compiler (2.7.2.x
comes to mind right away)?

References:
- Re: [rtl] root id
  - From: Der Herr Hofrat <der.herr@hofr.at>
- Re: [rtl] root id
  - From: Frederic Cazenave <cazenave@radar.mcgill.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: [rtl] unresolved symbol
Next by Date: Re: [rtl] LXRT and shared memory
Prev by thread: Re: [rtl] root id
Next by thread: Re: [rtl] root id
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread