[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
BOUNCE rtl@rtlinux.org: Approval required: (fwd)
- To: rtl@rtlinux.org
- Subject: BOUNCE rtl@rtlinux.org: Approval required: (fwd)
- From: Der Herr Hofrat <der.herr@hofr.at>
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 20:38:03 +0200 (CEST)
>From owner-rtl Tue May 8 12:43:40 2001
Received: from kanga.hofr.at (N733P019.adsl.highway.telekom.at [62.47.35.147])
by hq.fsmlabs.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f48IhcJ21189
for <rtl@rtlinux.org>; Tue, 8 May 2001 12:43:39 -0600
Received: (from hofrat@localhost)
by kanga.hofr.at (8.10.2/8.10.2/SuSE Linux 8.10.0-0.3) id f48HBHH09450
for rtl@rtlinux.org; Tue, 8 May 2001 19:11:17 +0200
From: Der Herr Hofrat <der.herr@hofr.at>
Message-Id: <200105081711.f48HBHH09450@kanga.hofr.at>
Subject: Re: [rtl] Maximum Sample Rate using RTLINUX
In-Reply-To: <41B6E7DDA9D5D3119B5700508B8B04E107536809@WBMAIL> from Adolf Ahmad
MS at "May 8, 2001 09:08:40 am"
To: rtl@rtlinux.org
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 19:11:16 +0200 (CEST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL60 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Dear David Olofson,
>
> Thank you for nice answer, of course this PPI 8225 card(using 8255 I/O chip
> with Strobe Mode 1) and without Hardware FIFO/buffer. I only use RT_FIFO.
> But if you have experience "What is the maximum Interrupt Frequencies of
> RT_IRQ", tell me more.
>
if you realy need very high sampling or realtime processing rates
you might consider using an SMP X86 with a dedicated CPU running
your high-speed RT-task - scheduling of tasks at 400KHz on a
400MHz PIII SMP are "posible" but don't expect much time to do
anything sensible this is "switching for the fun of it" , if
your demands are below that you might consider an SMP solution.
hofrat