BOUNCE rtl@rtlinux.org: Approval required: Non-member submissionfrom [Edouard TISSERANT <tissered@esstin.uhp-nancy.fr>] (fwd)

[Der Herr Hofrat <der.herr@hofr.at>]

>From owner-rtl Mon May 21 01:05:36 2001
Received: from esstin.esstin.u-nancy.fr (IDENT:root@esstin.u-nancy.fr [193.54.10.10])
	by hq.fsmlabs.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4L75Yr16998
	for <rtl@rtlinux.org>; Mon, 21 May 2001 01:05:35 -0600
Received: from 0 (IDENT:root@webmail.esstin.uhp-nancy.fr [193.54.10.60])
	by esstin.esstin.u-nancy.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA12518
	for <rtl@rtlinux.org>; Mon, 21 May 2001 09:00:48 +0200
Message-Id: <200105210700.JAA12518@esstin.esstin.u-nancy.fr>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2001 09:07:26 +0200
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?rtl=5Fmutex.c?= : =?iso-8859-1?q?rtl=5Fwait=5Fwakeup?= doesn't wakeup when needed...
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtl@rtlinux.org
User-Agent: IMHO/0.98.1 (Webmail for Roxen)
From: Edouard TISSERANT <tissered@esstin.uhp-nancy.fr>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hello.

I wonder if it wouldn't be usefull that rtl_wait_wakeup wake up
threads immediatly and not at the next scheduler call...

It could be a solution to add a call to rtl_schedule() at the end of
rtl_wait_wazkeup.

Maybe should we call rtl_schedule() at the end of each call to
pthread_kill ?

Maybe is it a POSIX specification ?

Thanks for your answer,

				Edouard