[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
BOUNCE rtl@rtlinux.org: Approval required: (fwd)
- To: rtl@rtlinux.org
- Subject: BOUNCE rtl@rtlinux.org: Approval required: (fwd)
- From: Der Herr Hofrat <der.herr@hofr.at>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 21:46:39 +0200 (CEST)
>From owner-rtl Mon May 21 06:01:28 2001
Received: from hq2.fsmlabs.com (hq2.fsmlabs.com [209.155.42.199])
by hq.fsmlabs.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f4LC1Gr19711
for <rtl@rtlinux.org>; Mon, 21 May 2001 06:01:17 -0600
Received: (qmail 11766 invoked by uid 1002); 21 May 2001 11:53:22 -0000
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 05:53:22 -0600
From: Victor Yodaiken <yodaiken@fsmlabs.com>
To: rtl@fsmlabs.com
Cc: rtl@rtlinux.org
Subject: Re: [rtl] rtl_mutex.c : rtl_wait_wakeup doesn't wakeup when needed...
Message-ID: <20010521055322.E11243@hq2>
References: <200105210700.JAA12518@esstin.esstin.u-nancy.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
In-Reply-To: <200105210700.JAA12518@esstin.esstin.u-nancy.fr>; from tissered@esstin.uhp-nancy.fr on Mon, May 21, 2001 at 09:07:26AM +0200
Organization: FSM Labs
rtl_wakeup_np _does_ call rtl_schedule.
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 09:07:26AM +0200, Edouard TISSERANT wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I wonder if it wouldn't be usefull that rtl_wait_wakeup wake up
> threads immediatly and not at the next scheduler call...
>
> It could be a solution to add a call to rtl_schedule() at the end of
> rtl_wait_wazkeup.
>
> Maybe should we call rtl_schedule() at the end of each call to
> pthread_kill ?
>
> Maybe is it a POSIX specification ?
>
> Thanks for your answer,
>
> Edouard
>
> -- [rtl] ---
> To unsubscribe:
> echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail majordomo@rtlinux.org OR
> echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail majordomo@rtlinux.org
> --
> For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
> http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/