Re: [rtl] RTLinux: C++ static members != good ?

[Luiz Gustavo Bizarro Mirisola <mirisola@ic.unicamp.br>]

On Wed, 30 May 2001, David Olofson wrote:

> In your main C++ module, you need to do something like
> 
> 	extern "C" {
> 		#include <linux/module.h>
>  
> 		int init_module(void);
> 		void cleanup_module(void);
> 		__do_global_ctors_aux();
> 		__do_global_dtors_aux();
> 	};   
> 
> and then call __do_global_ctors_aux() from init_module(), and 
> __do_global_dtors_aux() from cleanup_module(). That way, your global 
> variables and object instances will be initialized and destroyed properly 
> when the module is loaded and removed, respectively.

	Well, I am not an gcc expert too, but I have a class with one
static atribute and some static methods and I did not need to do
anything but using the usual C++ syntax.
	I have compiled it separately and linked it with the main
object file of the module. 
the static attribute is an object that does not have a default
constructor... Indeed it has only a int attribute and some methods
(the methods call rt-fifo functions). is this relevant?

-----------------------------------------------------------
Luiz Gustavo Bizarro Mirisola
Mestrando em Ciencia da Computacao - IC-Unicamp/LRV-IA-CTI		
MSc Student in Computer Science

mirisola@dcc.unicamp.br
-----------------------------------------------------------