BOUNCE rtl@rtlinux.org: Approval required: Non-member submissionfrom ["Dmitri A. Sergatskov" <dima@coffee.phys.unm.edu>] (fwd)

[Der Herr Hofrat <der.herr@hofr.at>]

>From owner-rtl Mon Jun  4 12:42:42 2001
Received: from cholla.phys.unm.edu (IDENT:root@cholla.phys.unm.edu [64.106.62.83])
	by hq.fsmlabs.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f54Iggx01643
	for <rtl@fsmlabs.com>; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 12:42:42 -0600
Received: from localhost (dima@localhost)
	by cholla.phys.unm.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f54Igxm17935;
	Mon, 4 Jun 2001 12:43:00 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: cholla.phys.unm.edu: dima owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 12:42:59 -0600 (MDT)
From: "Dmitri A. Sergatskov" <dima@coffee.phys.unm.edu>
X-X-Sender:  <dima@cholla.phys.unm.edu>
To: Richard Reeve <r.e.reeve@stir.ac.uk>
cc: <rtl@fsmlabs.com>
Subject: Re: [rtl] kernel compiling error - help!
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0106041856460.1386-100000@palp.stir.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106041237150.17924-100000@cholla.phys.unm.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Richard Reeve wrote:

> For another side to the gcc-2.96 issue see:
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/gcc-2.96.html
>

And nowhere there they say that gcc-2.96 is bad. All noise
is there mostly political. They mostly
object to (RedHat) policy to making an independent "releases"
that may confuse a lot of people.

The issues with kernels and misc. gcc's was beaten to death in misc.
mailing lists and I do not want to repeat all those arguments.
Go read bero page for very detail and technical discussion of gcc-2.96rh.

> Cheers,
>
> Richard Reeve.
>
>

Dmitri.