BOUNCE rtl@rtlinux.org: Approval required: (fwd)

[Der Herr Hofrat <der.herr@hofr.at>]

>From owner-rtl Mon Jul 23 18:38:14 2001
Received: from gateway.berkeley.innomedia.com (adsl-63-192-223-74.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.192.223.74])
	by hq.fsmlabs.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f6O0cE726999
	for <rtl@fsmlabs.com>; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 18:38:14 -0600
Received: from berkeley.innomedia.com (IDENT:root@berkeley.innomedia.com [192.168.1.5])
	by gateway.berkeley.innomedia.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA04499
	for <rtl@fsmlabs.com>; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:37:45 -0700
Received: (from mickey@localhost)
	by berkeley.innomedia.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) id f6O1Fbo30699
	for rtl@fsmlabs.com; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 18:15:37 -0700
From: Michael Thompson <mickey@berkeley.innomedia.com>
Message-Id: <200107240115.f6O1Fbo30699@berkeley.innomedia.com>
Subject: Re: [rtl] sample rate
To: rtl@fsmlabs.com
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 18:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3B5BFB27.74BCFF37@city.dk> from "Anders Gnistrup" at Jul 23, 2001 09:23:35 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Anders Gnistrup wrote:

> pIII 666mHz' -> latency between 9-19 uSec.
> PII 4000mHz -> latency between 5-14 uSec.
      ^^^^^^^

Hmmm.. I'll take one of these, although the latency number
seems kind of high for that clock speed :-)

-Michael Thompson
mickey@berkeley.innomedia.com

----- End of forwarded message from owner-rtl@fsmlabs.com -----