Michael Thompson wrote: > Anders Gnistrup wrote: > > > pIII 666mHz' -> latency between 9-19 uSec. > > PII 4000mHz -> latency between 5-14 uSec. ok, one digit to much. -> 400mHz. ;-) > > ^^^^^^^ > > Hmmm.. I'll take one of these, although the latency number > seems kind of high for that clock speed :-)