BOUNCE rtl@rtlinux.org: Approval required: (fwd)

[Der Herr Hofrat <der.herr@hofr.at>]

>From owner-rtl Sat Aug  4 04:19:11 2001
Received: from mta3.263.net ([202.96.44.45])
	by hq.fsmlabs.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f74AJBs30925
	for <rtl@fsmlabs.com>; Sat, 4 Aug 2001 04:19:11 -0600
Received: by mta3.263.net (Postfix, from userid 60001)
	id 52C681CF86599; Sat,  4 Aug 2001 18:21:22 +0800 (CST)
Message-Id: <3B6BCCA2.13654@mta3>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 18:21:22 +0800 (CST)
From: snowicemiao@263.net
To: rtl@fsmlabs.com
Subject: Re:[rtl] embedded Linux vs. VxWorks
X-Priority: 3
X-Originating-IP: [202.103.226.13]
X-Mailer: COREMAIL



>Hello,
>
>I'm trying to choose between a Linux embedded OS and a traditional embedded
>OS, such as VxWorks for the mpc8xx and the mpc8260.
   There are some other real-time embedded os such as psos+ ,qnx,os9,and so on.You can choose one of them to use for your subject. 
>
>Our system supports tasks, semaphores, interrupts, timers, etc.
>
>The response time is also important (context switching, interrupt latency,
>semaphores, messages).

 Psos+ can immplement the function above .It is a good Embedded realtime os.We use it in a router .It works very good.

>Another great factor is the debugging tools (such as simulators and tracing
>tools) and the support .
>
>Have you run benchmarks for these processors and these operating systems ?
>Can you send me the results ?
>
>What is your recommendation ?
>
>-------
>GilB.
>
>----- End of forwarded message from owner-rtl@fsmlabs.com -----
>-- [rtl] ---
>To unsubscribe:
>echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail majordomo@rtlinux.org OR
>echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail majordomo@rtlinux.org
>--
>For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
>http://www.rtlinux.org/
>
>
__________________________________________
DVD?oAE???O>AE10Oa  http://shopping.263.net/category02.htm
AAEYNoNO!c1/4o*EEYEiAO3/4?  http://shopping.263.net/category10.htm



----- End of forwarded message from owner-rtl@fsmlabs.com -----