Re: [rtl] Problems with RDTSC examples posted here recently

[Der Herr Hofrat <der.herr@hofr.at>]

> > if you compile method1 and method2A and look at the assembler coee they are
> > absolutly the same - the only difference on the source level is that its easier
> > to read "mov" than "0x31" thats all.
> 
> ".byte 0x0f 0x31" is a synonym for "rdtsc" - look at your disassembly
> again.  It's what we used in the bad old days when GNU assembler didn't
> understand the rdtsc mnemonic.  The "mov" is spurious and harmful.
>

yup - the mov is sensless.

overlooked that.

hofrat