[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: [rtl] Re: Shared memory > 32mb
Hey I wonder if he has that AMD K6 revision A that had the > 32M bug...it
caused seg faults. If so send it back and get a K6 rev B. I had an A and
B and can say definetly A was broken and B was fixed. It shows as
stepping 1 and stepping 2 (A and B respectively) in the /proc/cpuinfo
later
Randal
On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, William Montgomery wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Apr 1998, C. W. Wright (1698) wrote:
>
> >
> > Was there ever a resolution to the problem described below? I'm
> > encountering the exact same problem here.
> >
> > C. W. Wright
> >
> >
> > > In my attemps to use shared memory between user and RT task on a 64M
> > > Pentium, I ran into a problem regarding the base address of the memory
> > > range.
> > > When using a base address larger than 32M I got a segmentation fault
> > > like following:
>
> I'm not sure what the problem is that you are having. I am using a
> Pentium 100MHz with 64M and I use 1M shared memory at the top end;
> (63M up), I have the [ append = "mem=63m" ] statement in my lilo.conf.
> I am using Linux version 2.0.29 with the RT-Linux 0.5a and have no
> problem, all I can offer is that it is possible.
>
> William Montgomery
>
>
> --- [rtl] ---
> For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
> http://rtlinux.cs.nmt.edu/
>
--- [rtl] ---
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://rtlinux.cs.nmt.edu/