[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
[rtl] POSIX
- To: Real-Time Linux <rtl@rtlinux.cs.nmt.edu>
- Subject: [rtl] POSIX
- From: yodaiken@chelm.cs.nmt.edu
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 08:30:54 -0700
- In-Reply-To: <99022611275100.16264@bacchus.pc1.uni-duesseldorf.de>; from Jochen Kuepper on Fri, Feb 26, 1999 at 11:27:16AM +0100
- References: <99022611275100.16264@bacchus.pc1.uni-duesseldorf.de>
o
I've been reading POSIX 1003.13 RT standard and see that RTL could
meet the "minimal real time system" spec without much pain. Does
anyone out there care?
The larger POSIX standard seems basically pointless for hard RT, although
I'm looking for ideas on how to allow for "soft rt" linux processes.
One idea would be to use the RTL tasks to control scheduling of Linux
processes in response to queue lengths and other hints. Suggestions?
--- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail majordomo@rtlinux.cs.nmt.edu OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail majordomo@rtlinux.cs.nmt.edu
----
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/~rtlinux/