[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: [rtl] java or QT?

To: jochen@pc1.uni-duesseldorf.de, rtl@rtlinux.cs.nmt.edu
Subject: Re: [rtl] java or QT?
From: Peter Wurmsdobler <peterw@cetehor.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 1999 13:04:32 +0100
References: <000f01bf0506$1c0203e0$45d00209@watson.ibm.com> <002101bf05ce$237c1700$4f38bfa8@good> <19990922221103.A9230@itslinux.org> <99110511445001.10942@bacchus.pc1.uni-duesseldorf.de>

HI,

> Well, I have a very differnt experience. For me Qt is always considerably
> faster then comparable tcl/tk stuff.
I have used GTK+ and had the impression, that it is faster
than Qt. But Qt is nice, too.

peterw
                 Ceterum censeo MIRCOSOFTem esse delendam.
--- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail majordomo@rtlinux.cs.nmt.edu OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail majordomo@rtlinux.cs.nmt.edu
----
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/~rtlinux/

References:
- Re: [rtl] java or QT?
  - From: Jochen <jochen@uni-duesseldorf.de>

Prev by Date: AW: [rtl] CAN-driver
Next by Date: Re: [rtl] Scheduling a usermode process
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread