Re: [rtl] We are missing a whole point.

[Alex Dubov <oak@puma.technion.ac.il>]

yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote:
> 
> So why are ordinary Linux processes or Linux + shed_setsched not
> good enough for you?
> 
 It is good enough for me. But it is not good for the modern OS kernel
(and anyway, I prefer the controlled responce time feature to be
available).

> 
> Can't be done for high speed RT and current microprocessor designs.
> 
 It can be argued. Anyway, there are too many issues on the MP design
and MP/OS interface.


> 
> RTLinux V2 supports open("/dev/x")
>
 What about open("/proc/sys/mycard") and special arbiter that will
associate "mycard" name with
the proper driver and will load it on demand (automatically creating an
interface point in the
/proc/sys directory). This will avoid the mess with major numbers.
--- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail majordomo@rtlinux.cs.nmt.edu OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail majordomo@rtlinux.cs.nmt.edu
----
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/~rtlinux/